Photo: Passengers on a bus watch as Iraqi soldiers and
Around 1 pm, a mortar shell hit Shulla neighborhood injring 2 civilians.
Around 3 pm, a roadside bomb exploded in Nahrawan neighborhood killing 1 and injuring 1.
Around 5 pm, mortar shelling hit Jisr Diyala neighborhood (east of Baghdad) without casualties.
Around 5.30 pm, mortar shelling hit Shulla neighborhood (north west Baghdad) without casualties
Mussayab:
Hit:
Tal Afar:
Al Anbar Prv:
Thanks to whisker for ALL the links above.
REPORTS – LIFE IN
Amnesty International Appalled By Stoning To Death of Yezidi Girl
Amnesty International is appalled by the killing of Du’a Khalil Aswad, aged about 17, who was stoned to death on or around 7 April 2007 for a so-called honour crime. A member of Iraq’s Yezidi religious minority from the village of Bahzan in northern Iraq, she was killed by a group of eight or nine men and in the presence of a large crowd in the town of Bashika, near the city of Mosul. Some of her relatives are said to have participated in the killing. Du’a Khalil Aswad’s murder is said to have been committed by relatives and other Yezidi men because she had engaged in a relationship with a Sunni Muslim boy and had been absent from her home for one night. Some reports suggested that she had converted to Islam, but others deny this. Initially, she was reportedly given shelter in the house of a Yezidi tribal leader in Bashika, but her killers stormed the house, took her outside and stoned her to death. Her death by stoning, which lasted for some 30 minutes, was recorded on video film which was then widely distributed and is available on the internet. The film reportedly shows that members of local security forces were present but failed to intervene to prevent the stoning or arrest those responsible. In an apparent act of retaliation, some 23 Yezidi workers were attacked and killed on 22 April, apparently by members of a Sunni armed group. The Yezidis, reportedly all men, were travelling on a bus between
Failed Suicides Create Plastic Surgery Demand
Many of those who survive attempts at self-immolation are now opting to have cosmetic surgery to get rid of their scars. Suham Ghafoor obsessively tries to hide her face in public. Once proud of her beauty, she now is ashamed to show the scars left on her face by her attempt to burn herself to death. Last year, after many bitter arguments with her husband, the young woman decided to end her life by setting herself on fire. It was the only way she could think of to escape a life of abuse at the hands of her husband. Now she is one of a growing number of women having plastic surgery to remove the burns left by her failed suicide bid. Before she set herself alight, Ghafoor said she wondered what would happen to her two children without her, but even that didn’t stop her. "I knew it was the end of my life," she said, "I just wanted to escape from life and the insults of my husband." Armed with five litres of kerosene and a lighter, she disappeared into the bathroom where no one could see her. Soon afterwards, she rushed out, covered in flames and screaming for help. Neighbours came and smothered her in wet blankets before taking her to the hospital, where she spent several weeks in recovery before returning home to her old life.
Iraqis Powerless To Fix Generators
Electricity generators that Bechtel Corp. installed at Baghdad International Airport have not been maintained by the Iraqi government and no longer run, according to a report Thursday.
Because of the numerous checkpoints and extremist groups lying in wait, Salim Sultan's journey from his hometown Baquba to
REPORTS – IRAQI MILITIAS, POLITICIANS, POWER BROKERS
Force Will Not Bring Security, Say Tribal Chiefs
Tribal leaders in
REPORTS – US/UK/OTHERS IN
Serving British Soldier Exposes Horror of War in 'Crazy' Basra
A British soldier has broken ranks within days of returning from Iraq to speak publicly of the horror of his tour of duty there, painting a picture of troops under siege, "sitting ducks" to an increasingly sophisticated insurgency. "Basra is lost, they are in control now. It's a full-scale riot and the Government are just trying to save face," said Private Paul Barton. The 27-year-old, who returned from his second tour of Iraq this week along with other members of 1st Battalion, the Staffordshire Regiment, insisted that he remains loyal to the Army despite such public dissent. He said he had already volunteered to go to Afghanistan later this year. But, he said, he felt strongly that somebody had to speak out: "I want people to see it as it is; not the sugar-coated version." His public protest is a sign of the groundswell of anger among the troops, and predictions that more will come forward to break the traditional covenant of silent service. Just last month, Pte Steve Baldwin, 22, a soldier in the same regiment, spoke to The Independent about the way he had been "pushed aside" since being injured by a roadside bomb which killed three others during the Staffords' first tour of Iraq in 2005. And on Monday, Cpl Richard Bradley also chose to air his views on television: "Blokes are dying for no cause at all and blokes are getting injured for no cause at all."
Stealing From The Poor and Giving To The Rich
His statements were shocking, as were his many statistics: Iraq was simply and shamelessly robbed blind during the period of US-championed UN sanctions. Sadly, the robbery and mismanagement continue to this day, but now the figures are much more staggering. As Mr von Sponeck spoke, I reflected on my lengthy interview with Iraq's former Ambassador to the United Nations Mohamed Al-Duri. Al-Duri, being interviewed for the first time by English-language media since taking up his post at the UN, revealed to me in early 2001, in equally shocking detail, what sanctions had done to his country and people. He claimed that the UN was a key part of the problem. Led by two countries, the US and Britain, the UN Oil for Food Programme and the "humanitarian" mission it established in Iraq was reducing Iraqis to beggary, robbing the country blind and mis-managing funds, whereas the large bulk fuelled UN-related missions and operations, with needy Iraqi families receiving next to nothing. He spoke of the manipulation of Iraq's wealth for political purposes and alleged that the UN was a tool in the hands of the US government, aimed at encouraging widespread popular dissatisfaction with Saddam's government, before the country was dragged into war.
In hindsight, Al-Duri's assessment was very accurate. Promoting his new book, A Different Kind of War, von Sponeck reiterated in essence and substance Al-Duri's claims; the only difference is that von Sponeck was an insider; his numbers and stories impeccable and hardly contestable. It's no wonder that one and a half years after taking up his post in Baghdad, in 1998, he resigned. Even within such an uncongenial bureaucracy like the UN, some people still possess a living conscience; von Sponeck was and remains a man of great qualities. By March 2003, when American forces invaded Iraq, the UN was generating $64 billion in sales of Iraqi oil, according to von Sponeck. But scandalously, only $28 billion reached the Iraqi people. If distributed evenly, each Iraqi received half a US dollar per day. According to UN figures, an individual living under one dollar per day is classified as living in "abject poverty". Even during the most destructive phases of the war with Iran, Iraq managed to provide relatively high living standards. Its hospitals were neither dilapidated nor did its oil industry lie in ruins. Only after the advent of UN sanctions in 1991 did Iraqis suffer with such appalling magnitude. Alas, the tyranny of Saddam Hussein expanded to become the tyranny of the international community as well.
COMMENTARY
Fisk Takes Western Officials - And Reporters - To Task
In wide-ranging remarks during a lecture at the American University of Beirut on Thursday, veteran British journalist Robert Fisk sharply criticized US policy in Iraq, analyzed shortcomings in Western journalism on the Middle East and reflected on the state of politics in the region, saying he was "distressed" by what he called the people's hesitancy to question rulers. The lecture, entitled "After the Collapse: Disengagement in the Middle East," ran for about 45 minutes and was followed by more than 20 minutes of questions. A live telecast of the remarks was broadcast in a second room to accommodate an overflow crowd. Fisk, who lived and reported in Lebanon throughout the Civil War, has for many years worked in the region as a correspondent for Britain's Independent newspaper. He is also the author of the widely read "Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War," among other titles. In a spirited style that kept the audience laughing, Fisk lampooned Western journalists for their lack of historical perspective when reporting from the Middle East. "I asked myself, how do our journalists go to war without history books?" he said. In order to drive home his point about how poorly journalists had covered the Iraq war and how ignorant of history they had been, Fisk retold the story of the failed 1917-1920 British occupation of the country in a way that mirrored the current track of the United States there. The US excursion has been a "fingerprint parallel of history," he said. Again pointing a finger at Western journalists, Fisk ran through articles from The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times, noting that although the incidents reported in the articles took place in Iraq, the only sources cited were US officials. Fisk discussed journalists' tendency to illustrate division in the Middle East, such as divisions between Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds in Iraq, by using maps. He then noted that journalists rarely dare to show such disunity within their own countries, noting that a US paper would never run maps of the racial divisions in Washington.
Iraqi Positions on the Democrats' "Withdrawal" Initiative
An Al-Hayat reporter prepared a round-up of comments by people from some of the main political groups in Iraq, on the Democrats' passage of the bill that would tie war-funding to the announcement of a schedule for withdrawal. (This assumes "withdrawal" means what it says. Critiquing that is another question entirely).
What this comes down to is that spokesmen for the Maliki administration, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, and the main Kurdish coalition in parliament, all think the bill is a bad idea, and mostly for the same reason: Namely, that US "withdrawal" should be tied to the ability of the Iraqi forces to take over all security responsibilities, and should not be scheduled independently of that. In various ways, these groups all warn about chaos if that factor is ignored.
On the other side of the question is the Sadrist spokesman:
Nasr al-Saadi, deputy for the Sadrist block, said: "The occupation forces are the root cause of all of the security and political problems from which the country is suffering. ...The American administration controls the decisions of the Iraqi government, and consequently the latter lacks autonomy and desicion-making power. Once the occupation withdraws from the country, the government will be able to extend its control over the Iraqi scene".
And the journalist notes the Sadrists aren't the only group supporting the withdrawal idea.
The issue of American withdrawal from Iraq is a core demand of the main armed resistance groups, which have made [withdrawal] a condition to their entering into any negotiations with the American forces that would involve disarming and entering in to the political process.
Quote of the day: "The essence of tragedy is not the doing of evil by evil men but the doing of evil by good men, out of weakness, indecision, sloth, inability to act in accordance with what they know to be right." - I. F. Stone
0 comments:
Post a Comment